Technics EAH-AZ100 vs Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Skullcandy
35 Gesamtbewertung
Was Käufer sagen
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 von 100 mittlere Konfidenz 28 Bewertungen
Die Technics EAH-AZ100 Ohrhörer werden für ihre außergewöhnliche Klangqualität mit tiefen Bässen, klaren Höhen und immersivem Audio überwiegend gelobt. Komfort, Akkulaufzeit und Geräuschunterdrückung werden ebenfalls häufig hervorgehoben, obwohl einige Nutzer den hohen Preis und die begrenzte Lautstärke bemängeln. Kleinere Probleme wie Bluetooth-LE-Abbrüche und anfängliche Multi-Device-Kopplung wurden erwähnt, aber die Gesamtstimmung ist sehr positiv.
Vorteile
- Außergewöhnliche Klangqualität
- Tiefe immersive Bässe
- Effektive Geräuschunterdrückung
- Bequemer Sitz
- Hervorragende Akkulaufzeit
Nachteile
- Hoher Preis
- Begrenzte maximale Lautstärke
- Bluetooth-LE-Abbrüche
- Probleme bei der Multi-Device-Kopplung
- Kunststoff-Außenseite
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Noch kein Kundenfeedback
Bewertungen
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Spezifikationen
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 22 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Skullcandy Grind Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones, Up to 40 Hours Battery, Noise Isolating Fit, Microphone for iPhone Android, Customizable via Skull-iQ App - Light Grey/Blue |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Alexa |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Skull-iQ App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | Water-Resistant |
Vor- & Nachteile
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong connectivity (69th percentile)
- Below average mic (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average comfort (27th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average affordability (34th percentile)
Preise
Technics EAH-AZ100
No current pricing available
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Fazit
Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.
