Anker SoloCam T8170 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Anker SoloCam T8170
Anker
31 Overall Score
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
Olympus
74 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Anker SoloCam T8170
No customer feedback yet
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
82 out of 100 high confidence 103 reviews
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is overwhelmingly praised as a compact, lightweight, and feature-rich camera that delivers excellent image quality, especially for beginners and travel photographers. Users love the 5-axis image stabilization, the 20MP sensor, and the ease of use, with many noting it's a great value for the price. However, a few reviewers experienced issues with customer support, a blank screen defect, and the lack of a fully articulating screen, while others found the menu system complex and the buttons small.
Pros
- compact and lightweight
- excellent image quality
- 5-axis image stabilization
- great value for money
- beginner-friendly
Cons
- poor customer support
- blank screen defect
- no weather sealing
- small and cramped buttons
- complex menu system
Image quality 18
Portability 15
Ease of use 12
Value for money 10
Image stabilization 6
Customer support 4
Scores
Beginner
Youtube
Streaming
Video
Vlogging
Product Photography
Photography
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Specifications
| Anker SoloCam T8170 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | Live MOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 3 MP | 20.299999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic VIII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✗ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✗ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264/MOV |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.63 kg | 0.34 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 360 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | — | Micro-USB 2.0★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Anker SoloCam T8170
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
- Strong affordability (70th percentile)
- Below average sensor (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average video (25th percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong battery (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Scores 74 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 22 of 33 specs.