QJF M126 vs Technics EAH-AZ100

QJF M126

QJF M126

QJF
34 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

QJF M126

62 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

Users generally appreciate the comfort and fit of these earbuds, especially for sleep or work use where only one bud is worn at a time. However, several reviews mention inconsistent battery life, with some reporting only 3-4 hours, and a few units have buzzing or rattling noises. Pairing issues and mediocre sound quality are also noted, but the noise cancellation and automatic call transfer are praised.

Pros
  • Comfortable fit
  • Good noise cancellation
  • Clear call quality
  • Automatic style transfer
  • Decent battery life for case
Cons
  • Inconsistent battery life (3-4 hrs)
  • Buzzing or rattling noises in some units
  • Pairing difficulties
  • Mediocre sound quality
  • Unhelpful instructions
🤔 Battery life 4
👍 Comfort 3
🤔 Sound quality 4
👍 Noise cancellation 2
👎 Pairing issues 2
👎 Build quality 2

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Calls
QJF
26
Technics
100
Travel
QJF
34
Technics
100
Music
QJF
34
Technics
94
Commute
QJF
32
Technics
94
Gaming
QJF
36
Technics
92
Fitness
QJF
43
Technics
88
Budget
QJF
54
Technics
88

Specifications

QJF M126Technics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylein-eartrue wireless
Ear Tipss5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.09 kg0.01 kg★
Audio
Driver Type—dynamic
Driver Size—10 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz★
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
CodecsInvisible Mini Sleep Earbuds Wireless Bluetooth, 2-in-1 Dual Design for Side Sleepers, Ultra-Low Profile Soft Ear Tips for Small Ears, Noise Blocking Sleep Headphones with Portable Charging CaseAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround—Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth6.05.3★
Profiles—AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired ConnectorBluetooth 5Bluetooth
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life4.5 hrs8 hrs★
Charge Time—2.5 hrs★
Fast ChargingYes★15 min. for 90 min. playback
Charging—USB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery30 hrs★28 hrs
Case Charging—USB-C★
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls✗✓★
App—Android & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceWaterproofIPX4

Pros & Cons

QJF M126

  • Strong build (71st percentile)
  • Strong comfort (70th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (68th percentile)
  • Strong battery (68th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Pricing

QJF M126

Technics EAH-AZ100

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider