Sigma AFK9B0 vs TT Artisan A35BS-X 23mm f/1.4
Sigma AFK9B0
TT Artisan A35BS-X 23mm f/1.4 APS-C
Scores
Specifications
| Sigma AFK9B0 | TT Artisan A35BS-X 23mm f/1.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 23 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 23 mm |
| Elements | 13 | — |
| Groups | 10 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 0★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.4 |
| Min Aperture | f/16 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sigma SA | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.22 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:5★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Sigma AFK9B0
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong portability (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong affordability (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong af (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average wide angle (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average video (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
TT Artisan A35BS-X 23mm f/1.4 APS-C
- Strong affordability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong portability (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average video (29th percentile)
- Below average reach (30th percentile)
- Below average build (31st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Scores 76 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.