Sigma AFK9B0 vs Meike 25mm f/0.95

Sigma AFK9B0

Sigma AFK9B0

Sigma
76 Overall Score
vs
Meike 25mm f/0.95 APS-C

Meike 25mm f/0.95 APS-C

Meike
40 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
92
Meike
72
Portrait
Sigma
81
Meike
40
Street
Sigma
75
Meike
54
Professional
Sigma
71
Meike
36
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
58
Meike
21
Travel
Sigma
58
Meike
24
Video Cinema
Sigma
41
Meike
31
Landscape
Sigma
41
Meike
31
Macro
Sigma
36
Meike
21

Specifications

Sigma AFK9B0Meike 25mm f/0.95
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min135 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm25 mm
Elements1311
Groups109
Aspherical Elements0★—
ED Elements4★—
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-layered
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/0.95
Min Aperturef/16f/16
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades913★
Build
MountSigma SAFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.09 kg★0.60 kg
Filter Thread105 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHyper Sonic AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance875 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification1:5★—

Pros & Cons

Sigma AFK9B0

  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong portability (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong affordability (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong af (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average wide angle (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average video (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Meike 25mm f/0.95 APS-C

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average af (21st percentile)
  • Below average macro (21st percentile)
  • Below average video (29th percentile)

Pricing

Meike 25mm f/0.95 APS-C is €98 cheaper (1.8x less).

Sigma AFK9B0

Meike 25mm f/0.95 APS-C

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma AFK9B0

Scores 76 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma AFK9B0 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider