Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
84 Overall Score
vs
Crucial 64GB (4x16GB) DDR4-2666 CL19 (CT4K16G4DFD8266)
Crucial
62 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
No customer feedback yet
Crucial 64GB (4x16GB) DDR4-2666 CL19 (CT4K16G4DFD8266)
85 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews
The majority of users found the RAM easy to install and immediately effective for upgrades in workstations and desktops. One verified review strongly criticised the product for not being an ECC kit as advertised, calling the description misleading and overpriced. However, nearly all other feedback was positive, noting plug-and-play compatibility, speed improvements, and good seller support.
Pros
- Easy plug-and-play installation
- Noticeable speed improvement
- Good seller support
- Compatible with Dell workstations
Cons
- Not actually ECC memory
- Overpriced for non-ECC kit
Ease of installation 5
Speed improvement 3
Compatibility 4
Product accuracy 1
Value for money 1
Seller support 2
Scores
Gaming
Budget
Server
Workstation
Laptop
Specifications
| Team Group | Crucial 64GB DDR4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 4★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32 | 19★ |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | — |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
Crucial 64GB (4x16GB) DDR4-2666 CL19 (CT4K16G4DFD8266)
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average affordability (26th percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Team Group
Scores 84 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.