주요 차이점

• VRAM is a 14GB gap: the SRhonyra has 2GB of GDDR5 on a 64-bit bus, while the XFX packs 16GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. That's the difference between struggling to run modern games at 1080p and cruising at 1440p.
• PassMark G3D score tells the whole story: 2,400 vs 17,335. The XFX is roughly 7x faster in real-world graphics workloads, and its GPU compute score of 8,969 vs 1,251 means it's not even close for anything beyond basic display output.
• Clock speeds are wildly different: the SRhonyra runs at 1,228 MHz with no boost, while the XFX boosts up to 2,810 MHz. That's more than double the frequency on top of having way more cores.
• The SRhonyra's one spec win that looks weird is bandwidth (504 vs 288), but that's a quirk of how the numbers are calculated. In practice, the XFX's GDDR6 on a wider bus delivers far more usable memory performance.
• Customer sentiment is actually solid for both, but for different reasons. SRhonyra owners love the compact single-slot design and dual HDMI 4K@60Hz output for mini-ITX builds. XFX owners rate it 4.6/5 across 147 reviews, which is a much bigger sample size and suggests the card delivers on its gaming promises without major reliability complaints.