Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 vs Intel Core i7 2600
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
be quiet!
40 综合评分
vs
Intel Core i7 2600 4-core LGA1155
Intel
50 综合评分
买家怎么说
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
暂无用户反馈
Intel Core i7 2600 4-core LGA1155
92 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Intel Core i7-2600 因其卓越的速度和多线程性能而备受赞誉，特别是在视频编辑、3D 渲染和虚拟化方面。用户强调其高默认时钟速度（带涡轮加速）、超线程技术、集成高清显卡以及出色的性价比。少数用户提到原装散热器质量不佳，但大多数用户对其性能和可靠性非常满意。
优点
- 卓越的速度和性能
- 超线程技术支持8个逻辑核心
- 集成高清显卡
- 非常适合视频编辑和3D渲染
- 支持虚拟化（VT-d）
缺点
- 原装散热器质量差
- 不是解锁版"K"
- 超频需要专业知识
Performance speed 22
Multitasking 12
Hyper threading 7
Integrated graphics 5
Value for money 6
Stock cooler quality 2
评分
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | Intel Core i7 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | Core i7 |
| Model | 1200 | 2600 |
| Codename | Zen | Sandy Bridge |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14★ | 32 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 4 | 8★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 2★ | 1 |
| L3 Cache | 8 | 8 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 21★ |
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16★ | — |
| TDP | 270 | 95★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
优缺点
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
Intel Core i7 2600 4-core LGA1155
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong affordability (73rd percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
价格
结论
胜出: Intel Core i7 2600
Scores 50 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 26 specs.
