Dell Desktop ECT1250 vs HP All-in-One 24-cr0034
Dell Desktop ECT1250 2025, Core Ultra 7, 32GB, 2TB SSD, Black
HP All-in-One 24-cr0034 2025, Core i5-1334U, 8GB, 512GB SSD, Shell White
买家怎么说
Dell Desktop ECT1250 2025, Core Ultra 7, 32GB, 2TB SSD, Black
所有五位评论者都给予这款戴尔台式机最高评分,称赞其速度快、运行安静且体积小巧。用户强调其易于设置,价格极具竞争力,尤其与戴尔会员网站相比。购买的主要原因是升级到Windows 11,这台电脑完美满足了这一需求。
优点
- 快速启动和文件访问
- 运行安静
- 紧凑尺寸适合桌下
- 即插即用设置简便
- 与戴尔网站相比价格优越
缺点
- 问答环节信息缺失
- 对未来Windows升级的担忧
HP All-in-One 24-cr0034 2025, Core i5-1334U, 8GB, 512GB SSD, Shell White
HP一体机因其紧凑的设计、简单的设置和快速的性能而获得压倒性的正面反馈。用户欣赏清晰的图形和充足的存储空间,但一位评论者指出,Ultra 5处理器在连接额外显示器时可能会吃力,并建议将其用于学校作业等基本任务。
优点
- 紧凑节省空间的设计
- 简单快速的设置
- 快速响应的性能
- 清晰明亮的显示屏
- 大存储容量
缺点
- 在连接额外显示器时多任务处理受限
- 处理器可能不够强大(Ultra 5)
评分
规格
| Dell Desktop ECT1250 | HP All-in-One 24-cr0034 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 7 265★ | Intel Core i5 1334U |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 20★ | 10 |
| Frequency | 2.4 GHz★ | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB★ | 12 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | Intel UHD Graphics★ | Intel UHD Graphics |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| VRAM Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 8 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Storage 1 | 2 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | sff | aio |
| PSU | 180W★ | 90W |
| Weight | 6.41 kg | 5.53 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB Ports | 7★ | 4 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 | 1 x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort 1.4 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
优缺点
Dell Desktop ECT1250 2025, Core Ultra 7, 32GB, 2TB SSD, Black
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong storage (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
HP All-in-One 24-cr0034 2025, Core i5-1334U, 8GB, 512GB SSD, Shell White
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong reliability (70th percentile)
- Below average ram (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average storage (29th percentile)
结论
Scores 93 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 24 specs.