Apple Mac Studio M5 Max vs HP All-in-One 27-cr0012
Apple Mac Studio M5 Max, 64GB, 4TB SSD
HP All-in-One 27-cr0012 2024, Ryzen 7 7730U, 32GB, 1TB SSD
买家怎么说
Apple Mac Studio M5 Max, 64GB, 4TB SSD
用户对搭载M5 Max的Mac Studio非常满意,称赞其性能,尤其是在媒体制作和4K编辑方面。从旧Mac或PC升级被视为重大改进,许多人注意到M5 Max芯片的速度和能力。有人提到在促销时购买的优势,并且制造质量和生态系统集成受到赞赏。
优点
- 超快M5 Max芯片
- 非常适合4K编辑
- 升级路径顺畅
- 促销时物有所值
- 可靠的Apple制造质量
缺点
- 不打折时价格昂贵
- 基础存储可能有限
- 新功能需要最新macOS
HP All-in-One 27-cr0012 2024, Ryzen 7 7730U, 32GB, 1TB SSD
大多数买家称赞HP 27英寸一体机,认为其Ryzen 7性能快速、32 GB内存充裕、设计时尚。然而,一位已验证买家收到了一台二手设备,该设备频繁死机且扬声器有静电噪音问题,导致退货。总体而言,这是一台适用于办公室、学校或家庭的可靠且优雅的机器,但缺乏升级选项和触控屏。
优点
- 快速的Ryzen 7性能
- 32 GB充足内存
- 时尚微边框设计
- 内置弹出式网络摄像头
- 适合休闲聆听的出色扬声器
缺点
- 无触摸屏选项
- 升级/扩展可能性有限
- 支架无高度调节
- 部分用户报告随机关机问题
- 强制Windows 11默认设置(Bing)
评分
规格
| Apple Mac Studio M5 Max | HP All-in-One 27-cr0012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Apple M5 Max★ | AMD Ryzen 7 7730U |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 18★ | 8 |
| Frequency | — | 4.5 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | Apple (40-Core)★ | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| VRAM | 64 GB★ | 32 GB |
| VRAM Type | System Shared | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 64 GB★ | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Storage 1 | 4 TB★ | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mini | aio |
| PSU | 480W★ | — |
| Weight | 2.70 kg | 6.42 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 6★ | — |
| USB Ports | 2★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 5 x 4 | — |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | WiFi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6.0 | Yes |
| Ethernet | 10GbE | — |
| System | ||
| OS | macOS | Windows 11 Home |
优缺点
Apple Mac Studio M5 Max, 64GB, 4TB SSD
- Strong reliability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ram (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong storage (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong cpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
HP All-in-One 27-cr0012 2024, Ryzen 7 7730U, 32GB, 1TB SSD
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong reliability (70th percentile)
- Below average port selection (5th percentile)5th %ile
结论
Scores 100 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.