HP OMEN GT16-0364 vs Apple Mac mini M5 Pro
HP OMEN GT16-0364 2025, Ryzen 7 8700F, 32GB, 1TB SSD, RTX 5070, Panda Metal
Apple Mac mini M5 Pro 2026, 24GB, 512GB SSD, Silver
买家怎么说
HP OMEN GT16-0364 2025, Ryzen 7 8700F, 32GB, 1TB SSD, RTX 5070, Panda Metal
搭载Ryzen 7 8700F和RTX 5070的HP OMEN 35L台式机获得了压倒性的正面反馈。用户称赞其强大的性能、安静的运行和出色的散热,使其成为游戏和生产力任务的理想选择。构建质量和设计也被强调为坚固和现代。问答中提到了关于附带外设和灯光定制的一些小问题,但总体情绪非常高。
优点
- 强大的性能
- 安静的运行
- 出色的散热
- 坚固的构建质量
- 快速的SSD存储
缺点
- 不包含键盘/鼠标
- 灯光定制不明确
Apple Mac mini M5 Pro 2026, 24GB, 512GB SSD, Silver
暂无用户反馈
评分
规格
| HP OMEN GT16-0364 | Apple Mac mini M5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F | Apple M5 Pro★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8 | 15★ |
| Frequency | 4.1 GHz★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | Apple M5 Pro 16-core |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 12 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 24 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | — |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mid-tower | mini |
| PSU | 850W★ | — |
| Weight | 14.50 kg | 0.73 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 8★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | 0 | Thunderbolt 5 x 3 |
| HDMI | 1 x HDMI | 1x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | 3 x DisplayPort | 1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | Bluetooth 6 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | 2.5Gb Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Home | macOS |
优缺点
HP OMEN GT16-0364 2025, Ryzen 7 8700F, 32GB, 1TB SSD, RTX 5070, Panda Metal
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gpu (89th percentile)89th %ile
Apple Mac mini M5 Pro 2026, 24GB, 512GB SSD, Silver
- Strong reliability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong gpu (70th percentile)
- Below average storage (29th percentile)
结论
Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.