Team Group 4TB SSD vs Kingston KC3000
Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Team Group
90 综合评分
vs
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
92 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
用户对这款金士顿KC3000固态硬盘的评价非常积极，称赞其极快的速度，尤其是在游戏和作为启动盘方面。许多人指出它超越或媲美三星990 Pro和西数SN850X等竞品，而且价格往往更优。少数人提到一些小设置问题，比如在新Windows系统上需要下载驱动程序或扇区大小差异，但这些都很容易解决，不影响整体满意度。
优点
- 速度极快
- 性价比高
- 超越竞品
- 非常适合游戏
- 性能可靠
缺点
- 新Windows系统需要下载驱动
- 克隆时扇区大小不匹配
- 4TB版本价格较高
Speed 8
Value for money 5
Gaming performance 4
Ease of setup 3
Reliability 3
Competitor comparison 4
评分
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Portable
规格
| Team Group 4TB SSD | Kingston KC3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | SLC★ | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | Maxio | Phison E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
优缺点
Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong random (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average affordability (16th percentile)16th %ile
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong random (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
价格
Team Group 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.093每美元得分
vs
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.267每美元得分
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 2.9 倍
结论
胜出: Kingston KC3000
Scores 98 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.
