Skullcandy Indy Evo S2IVW-N740

★★★★☆ 4.0 (43,317)

The Skullcandy Indy Evo stands out with 30 hours of total battery life and IP55-rated water, sweat, and dust resistance for all-weather use. Integrated Tile tracking technology makes locating misplaced earbuds straightforward, while touch controls provide full media and EQ mode management. These are best for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery endurance and rugged build quality over call clarity.

Form Factor in-ear
driver type dynamic
Wireless Yes
bluetooth version 5.0
battery life hours 6
case battery hours 30
water resistance Water-Resistant
Skullcandy Indy Evo S2IVW-N740 earbuds
42 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Skullcandy Indy Evo is a budget true wireless option with 30 hours of battery, IP55 water resistance, and built-in Tile tracking. Sound quality sits at the 29th percentile and the mic is nearly bottom-tier at 12th percentile. At CAD 102 or MXN 999, they make sense for gym use and people who lose things, but not for music lovers or call-heavy users. The Nothing Buds 2 offers better sound for similar money.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 30 hours total battery with rapid charge 88th
  • IP55 water, sweat, and dust resistance 74th
  • Built-in Tile tracking for lost buds 71st
  • Both earbuds work independently 70th
  • Comfort score in the 72nd percentile

Cons

  • Sound quality in the 29th percentile
  • Mic quality near the bottom at 12th percentile
  • Connectivity issues at 13th percentile
  • Build quality below average at 34th percentile
  • No active noise cancellation to speak of

What owners think

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has cooled since launch
58/100Our AI sentiment readhigh confidence · 202 sources · Nov 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '21: 4.0★ · 11 reviewsQ1 '22: 3.9★ · 53 reviewsQ2 '22: 3.8★ · 34 reviewsQ3 '22: 3.7★ · 37 reviewsQ4 '22: 3.6★ · 26 reviewsQ1 '23: 4.9★ · 10 reviewsQ2 '23: 4.2★ · 9 reviewsQ3 '23: 3.0★ · 7 reviewsQ4 '23: 3.2★ · 6 reviewsQ1 '24: 3.8★ · 5 reviewsQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '26: 3.0★ · 2 reviews (approx. date)1153343726109765112Q4 '21Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q1 '23Q2 '23Q3 '23Q4 '23Q1 '24Q2 '24Q3 '24Q2 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviewsEstimated date
  1. Q1 202460/1003.8★5 reviews

    Buyers in Q1 2024 reported good sound, comfort, and battery life, but some experienced connectivity issues and one had a fit problem. Overall, mixed but leaning positive.

    • Good sound, comfort, and long battery life, lasting multiple shifts.
    • Intermittent disconnections, one earbud cutting out, and static issues.
    • Fit can be problematic; earbuds may fall out, and one user noted they don't fit those without ears.
    • Good value for work use, a cheaper alternative to AirPods.
  2. Q4 202338/1003.2★6 reviews

    Buyers in this period praised sound quality and battery life, but many found the earbuds too large and uncomfortable, with one reporting a right bud failure after extended use.

    • Earbuds too big for small ears; silicone tips and sleeves don't fit securely, causing discomfort and charging issues.
    • Sound quality and battery life are good; Bluetooth connectivity is easy, and one user found them better than a pricier brand.
    • One right bud ceased working after 1.5-2 years; not recommended due to better options at the price.
    • Pairing method is poorly designed; Android app offers no help, making them harder to use than $10 earbuds.
  3. Q3 202343/1003.0★7 reviews

    Buyers praised sound, comfort, and battery life, but several reported failures after use, including one earbud dying and connectivity issues, leading to mixed sentiment.

    • Sound quality and comfort are praised, especially for the price.
    • Multiple reports of earbuds stopping working or one side failing.
    • Connectivity issues and poor sound in some units.
    • Battery life and case are good, but value questioned by some.
  4. Q2 202378/1004.2★9 reviews

    Buyers in Q2 2023 praised comfort, battery life, and value, but noted cheap materials, muffled sound, and one unit dying after a year.

    • Comfortable fit, long battery life, and good value for the price.
    • Sound quality praised in some modes but muffled by rubber ear guards.
    • Plastic build feels cheap; one unit died after a year of use.
    • Ambient mode amplifies wind and rain, reducing usefulness.
  5. Q1 202392/1004.9★10 reviews

    Buyers in Q1 2023 praised these earbuds for their sound quality, comfort, and value, with many noting they exceeded expectations for the price. A few minor drawbacks were mentioned, such as battery case limitations and slightly lower sound quality compared to wired options.

    • Excellent sound quality for the price, with multiple reviewers highlighting it as a key strength.
    • Comfortable fit, with users noting they can wear them for long periods without discomfort.
    • Great value for money, with several buyers emphasizing the low price relative to quality.
    • Battery case limitations: if case dies, earbuds must be manually powered off or disconnected, which some found inconvenient.
  6. Q4 202254/1003.6★26 reviews

    Buyers in Q4 2022 praised sound quality and value, but many reported pairing issues, defects, and inconsistent performance, leading to mixed sentiment.

    • Sound quality and value praised by many, with several noting good performance for the price.
    • Pairing and connectivity issues frequent, including earbuds not syncing or dropping connection.
    • Reliability concerns: defects, one side failing, and repeated purchases due to issues.
    • Comfort and fit generally good, but some found them not suitable for running or experienced ear discomfort.
  7. Q3 202262/1003.7★37 reviews

    Buyers in Q3 2022 praised sound quality, battery life, and value, but many reported pairing issues, charging problems, and discomfort. Some experienced defects like buds stopping working or failing to charge.

    • Sound quality and battery life are frequently praised, with many calling them great for the price.
    • Pairing and syncing issues are common, including buds pairing individually and frequent re-pairing needed.
    • Charging problems and defects like buds not charging or stopping working are reported by several users.
    • Fit and comfort are mixed; some find them falling out, especially during exercise, while others find them fine.
  8. Q2 202262/1003.8★34 reviews

    Buyers praised sound quality, fit, and battery life, but many reported reliability issues like charging failures, pairing problems, and ear tips detaching, leading to mixed sentiment.

    • Sound quality and bass are frequently praised as excellent for the price.
    • Multiple reports of earbuds failing to charge or hold charge within months, some unusable.
    • Pairing and connection issues: earbuds not connecting together, dropping signal, or hard to pair.
    • Fit is generally good, but some find earbuds fall out during exercise; ear tips can detach.
  9. Q1 202262/1003.9★53 reviews

    Buyers in this period praised the sound, fit, and value, but many reported pairing and connectivity issues, along with some comfort and volume complaints.

    • Frequent pairing and connectivity problems, including earbuds not pairing together or staying connected, were common complaints.
    • Sound quality and value were praised, with many saying they rival higher-priced earbuds.
    • Comfortable fit and secure during workouts, with several mentioning they stay in ears well.
    • Some found them comfortable, others uncomfortable; volume and bass were also criticized by a few.
  10. Q4 202173/1004.0★11 reviews

    Buyers in Q4 2021 generally praised the sound quality, comfort, and value, but a few reported durability issues, including one where sound degraded after a week.

    • Sound quality and bass are frequently praised, especially for the price.
    • Comfort and battery life are noted as strong points.
    • Good value for money, with several calling them a great purchase.
    • One review reports sound quality dropping after a week, raising durability concerns.

Based on 202 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Let's talk about what these do well first. Battery life lands at the 45th percentile, which sounds mediocre until you remember the price bracket. 30 hours total with the case is enough for a week of commutes, and the rapid charge feature means a quick top-up gets you back in the game. The IP55 rating is also a real selling point for gym use. Sweat and dust resistance at this price is not a given, and Skullcandy deserves credit for including it.

Sound quality is where things get rough. At the 29th percentile, these are firmly in the lower third of earbuds we've tested. The default tuning leans bass-heavy in that classic Skullcandy way, which works for podcasts and workout playlists but falls apart with anything that needs detail or separation. The mic situation is even worse at the 12th percentile. If you take a lot of calls, these will frustrate you and the person on the other end. Connectivity at the 13th percentile suggests dropouts and pairing quirks are part of the experience too.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 64.5
Mic 36.7
Build 70.7
Sound 27.4
Battery 74.3
Comfort 69.8
User Sentiment 8.4
Connectivity 87.7
Social Proof 62.7
Affordability 47.5

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style true wireless
Ear Tips s
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.1 lbs

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Drivers 1
Impedance 32
Hi-Res Audio No
Codecs Skullcandy Indy Evo True Wireless Earbuds S2IVW-N745 – 30Hrs Battery, Rapid USB‑C Charge, IP55 Sweat/Water Resistance, Tile Tracking, Touch Controls, Dual EQ Modes, Blue

Noise Control

ANC No
Transparency Yes

Connectivity

Wireless Yes
Bluetooth 5
Multipoint No
Wired Connector Bluetooth 5
Range 10.1

Earbud Battery

Battery Life 6
Charge Time 1
Fast Charging 10 min for 2 hours playback
Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Battery 30
Case Charging USB-C
Wireless Charging No

Microphone

Microphone Yes

Features

Voice Assistant Siri, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa
Touch Controls Yes
App Tile
Gaming Mode No
Bone Conduction No
Water Resistance Water-Resistant

vs Competition

Against the Sony WF-1000XM6 or Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation, the Indy Evo isn't even playing the same game. Those are flagship earbuds with excellent sound, strong ANC, and reliable connectivity. The Indy Evo costs a fraction of the price, and you feel that difference in every metric. The Sony and Apple options are for people who want the best wireless audio experience period. The Skullcandy is for people who want something that works okay and won't cause heartbreak when it gets lost.

The more interesting comparison is with the Nothing Buds 2 and Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro. The Nothing Buds 2 in particular occupy a similar budget-friendly space but with better sound and connectivity scores in our database. You lose the Tile tracking and the IP55 rating might not be as robust, but the core experience of listening to music is noticeably better. The Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro are pricier but offer a massive step up in sound, mic quality, and ANC. If you can stretch your budget, that's where we'd point you.

Spec Skullcandy Indy Evo S2IVW-N740 Technics EAH-AZ100 JLab JBuds Pods ANC Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation Soundcore P31i
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic
Wireless true true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation false true true true true true
Bluetooth Version 5.0 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.3 6.1
Battery Life Hours 6 8 10 6 8 10
Case Battery Hours 30 28 56 26 24 50
Water Resistance Water-Resistant IPX4 IP55 IP57 IP57 IP55
Multipoint false true true true true -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivitySocial ProofAffordability
Skullcandy Indy Evo S2IVW-N740 64.536.770.727.474.369.88.487.762.747.5
Technics EAH-AZ100 Compare 97.597.478.899.776.793.292.599.881.22.9
JLab JBuds Pods ANC Compare 93.597.490.887.19493.292.598.295.533
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro Compare 97.597.498.992.270.593.233.799.689.77.2
Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation Compare 97.58198.990.373.169.833.799.699.310.9
Soundcore P31i Compare 89.997.490.896.692.269.897.386.389.757.3

Price

Value & Pricing

Pricing is a bit scattered. We're seeing these at CAD 102 in Canada and MXN 999 in Mexico. That's budget territory in both markets, but the value proposition depends heavily on what you need. If you want gym earbuds that can survive sweat and won't ruin your day if they fall out of your pocket, the Indy Evo makes sense. The Tile integration alone is worth something if you're the type who loses small objects regularly.

But if sound quality or call performance matters at all, you're better off saving a bit more. The 29th percentile sound score means you're getting budget audio at a budget price, which is fair, but the connectivity issues push this from "acceptable compromise" to "sometimes annoying." For the same money in some markets, you can find options with better sound and more reliable connections, even if they lack the Tile tracking.

We started tracking prices for this product on Oct 30, 2026. The chart appears once we have more data.

Read more

Overview

The Skullcandy Indy Evo is one of those earbuds that makes you realize how much the true wireless market has changed. A few years ago, 30 hours of total battery life, touch controls, and IP55 water resistance would have been flagship territory. Now it's a budget play, and that's exactly where these sit. Skullcandy has always aimed at people who want decent sound without treating their earbuds like a fragile investment, and the Indy Evo leans into that hard.

Who are these for? Honestly, someone who loses things. The built-in Tile tracking is a genuinely smart addition at this price point, and the fact that both buds work independently means you can use one at a time and stretch that battery even further. The EQ modes for music, movie, and podcast are a nice touch too, even if the sound quality itself doesn't exactly light up our charts.

But here's the thing. Our database puts these at the 29th percentile for sound and 13th for connectivity. That's not great. The comfort score is solid at 72nd percentile, which matters more than people think for everyday use. But if you're expecting these to punch above their weight sonically, you'll want to keep reading.

Common Questions

Q: Are the Skullcandy Indy Evo good for working out?

Yes, this is actually their strongest use case. The IP55 rating means they can handle sweat, dust, and light rain without issue. The fit is comfortable enough for extended sessions based on the 72nd percentile comfort score. Just don't expect audiophile sound while you're lifting. The bass-heavy tuning works fine for workout playlists, but the connectivity issues might cause occasional dropouts mid-set.

Q: Can I use just one earbud at a time?

Yes, both earbuds work independently. Each one has full media controls for calls, track skipping, volume, and voice assistant activation. This is great for battery life since you can swap between buds and effectively double your listening time. It's also useful if you want to stay aware of your surroundings while listening to a podcast.

Q: How is the call quality on the Indy Evo?

Honestly, it's not good. The mic scores in the 12th percentile in our database, which puts it near the bottom of earbuds we've tested. People on the other end will likely complain about muffled audio or background noise. If you take frequent calls, these are not the earbuds for you. Look at options with better mic performance like the Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro.

Q: Does the Tile tracking actually work?

Yes, the Tile integration is built into the earbuds themselves. You download the Tile app and can locate your buds if they're misplaced. This is a genuinely useful feature that most earbuds at this price point don't offer. It's especially handy given how small true wireless earbuds are and how easy they are to lose.

Who Should Skip This

If you care about sound quality at all, skip these. The 29th percentile sound score means music sounds muddy and lacks detail compared to similarly priced options. Podcast listeners might be okay, but anyone who enjoys music as more than background noise will be disappointed. The Nothing Buds 2 or even some wired IEMs would serve you better.

Call-heavy users should also look elsewhere. The mic quality is near the bottom of our database, and the connectivity issues at the 13th percentile mean dropped connections are a real possibility. If you're on Zoom calls all day or use your earbuds for phone conversations regularly, spend a bit more on something with a decent mic. The Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro or Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation are much stronger choices for that use case.

Verdict

If you're a gym person who wants earbuds that can handle sweat, get lost without ruining your week, and still pump out enough bass to keep you moving, the Indy Evo is a reasonable pick. The IP55 rating and Tile tracking are genuinely useful features that most budget earbuds skip. The independent bud functionality is also handy for battery stretching and situational awareness.

For everyone else, we'd say look elsewhere. The sound quality is below average, the mic is nearly unusable for calls, and the connectivity issues will test your patience. These are earbuds for a specific use case, and outside of that use case, they're hard to recommend. If you want better all-around performance at a similar price, the Nothing Buds 2 is a stronger choice.

Usage Scores

Calls (34.1)Music (37.5)Overall (41.5)Budget (60.2)Gaming (39.6)Travel (44.9)Commute (43.5)Fitness (54.2)
  • Calls34.1
  • Music37.5
  • Overall41.5
  • Budget60.2
  • Gaming39.6
  • Travel44.9
  • Commute43.5
  • Fitness54.2

Similar Products