ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Dual EVO OC 12GB GDDR6X Black

★★★★★ 4.7 (352)

The compact 2.5-slot design and Axial-tech fans deliver efficient cooling in small chassis, while the 2555MHz boost clock and 12GB of GDDR6X memory drive strong 1440p gaming. Its 0dB silent mode and dual ball bearing fans offer quiet, durable operation for light gaming and long-term reliability. This card is best for 1440p gamers upgrading a small form factor build who want DLSS 3 frame generation without a massive power draw.

GPU GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM 12GB GDDR6X
Boost Clock 2555 MHz
TDP 200 W
Memory Bus 192 bit
Ray Tracing Yes
Class consumer
ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Dual EVO OC 12GB GDDR6X Black gpu
75 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The ASUS Dual RTX 4070 EVO OC scores 26,881 on PassMark, putting it in the 73rd percentile for raster performance, and its 90th percentile efficiency with a 200W TDP is genuinely impressive. But user sentiment sits at the 37th percentile, and the 12GB VRAM on a 192-bit bus has owners worried about longevity. At USD 530 it's a good deal; at USD 1,100 it's a trap.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • PassMark G3D score of 26,881 puts it in the 73rd percentile for raster performance 96th
  • 90th percentile efficiency with a modest 200W TDP 90th
  • 227mm length and 2.5-slot design fit easily in small cases 74th
  • 0dB technology keeps fans off during light gaming 72nd
  • DLSS 3 and AV1 encode support add real value

Cons

  • User sentiment sits at the 37th percentile, below what the specs suggest
  • Affordability ranks in the 38th percentile, and owners agree it's pricey for a 192-bit card
  • 12GB VRAM is only 59th percentile, which could age poorly
  • AI and compute performance are middling at 58th and 65th percentile
  • Listing photos show a 16-pin connector while the card actually uses 8-pin

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.7/5 (352 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently praise the compact 2.5-slot design and 227mm length for fitting into small cases without drama.
👍 Multiple buyers note the card runs cool and quiet, with the 0dB technology keeping fans off during light gaming.
👎 A recurring complaint is confusion over the power connector, with listing photos showing a 16-pin while the actual card uses an 8-pin.
👎 Some owners question the value, suggesting the price is too high for a 192-bit card with 12GB of VRAM.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
75/100Our AI sentiment readlow confidence · 7 sources · Jun 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '23: 4.9★ · 7 reviewsQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '26: 4.9★ · 26 reviews (approx. date)7126Q2 '23Q3 '23Q2 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviewsEstimated date

Based on 34 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

The 26,881 PassMark score puts this card in the 73rd percentile for raster performance, which translates to well above average for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The 5,888 CUDA cores and 2,555MHz boost clock (in OC mode) do the heavy lifting, and the 29.15 FP32 TFLOPS of compute is respectable for this tier. Ray tracing performance sits at the 70th percentile, so it's not going to blow you away in heavy RT workloads, but DLSS 3 support helps close the gap in games that use it.

The 12GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus gives you 480 GB/s of memory bandwidth. That's fine for most games today, but the VRAM capacity ranks in the 59th percentile, which means it's about average for the category. If you're planning to keep this card for four or five years, the 12GB might start feeling tight as games get hungrier. The efficiency story is better: 90th percentile efficiency with a 200W TDP means you're getting a lot of frames per watt, and the dual axial-tech fans with 0dB technology keep things quiet under light loads.

Performance Percentiles

AI 58.2
Rt 70.1
Vram 59.2
Raster 73.5
Compute 65
Feature 72.1
Thermal 55.9
User Sentiment 36.6
Efficiency 89.7
Connectivity 70.1
Social Proof 95.5
Affordability 34.7

Specifications

Full Specifications

Chipset

GPU Chipset GeForce RTX 4070
Brand NVIDIA
Architecture Ada Lovelace
Class consumer
Process 5

Memory

VRAM 12 GB
Memory Type GDDR6X
Memory Bus 192
Bandwidth 480

Compute

CUDA Cores 5888
Tensor Cores 144
RT Cores 36
Base Clock 2520
Boost Clock 2555
FP16 TFLOPS 29.15
FP32 TFLOPS 29.15

Performance

PassMark G3D 26881
GPU Compute 14631

Power & Cooling

TDP 200
Recommended PSU 650
Power Connectors 8-Pin
Cooler Dual Fan
Fans 2

Connectivity

Interface PCI Express 4.0
DisplayPort 3
HDMI 1
Max Displays 4
Max Resolution 7680 x 4320

Physical

Length 227
Slot Width 2.5
Form Factor ATX
Weight 1.4 kg / 3.0 lbs

Features

Ray Tracing Yes
Upscaling DLSS 3
AV1 Encode Yes
DirectX 12
RGB No

vs Competition

Against the MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti, this ASUS card is simply outclassed on raw performance, but it also costs significantly less at the low end of its price range. The 5070 Ti brings 16GB of VRAM and a wider memory bus, which matters if you're gaming at 1440p or higher. The Gigabyte AORUS RTX 5080 is in a completely different league, with roughly double the compute and memory bandwidth, but you'll pay for it. The ZOTAC RTX 5080 and Sapphire NITRO+ are similarly positioned as high-end options. Where the ASUS Dual 4070 EVO OC makes its case is efficiency and size: the 200W TDP and 227mm length beat most of those bigger cards for small form factor builds. If you're building in a compact case and want DLSS 3 without a massive power draw, this card is a reasonable pick. If you have a full tower and a bigger budget, the 5070 Ti is the smarter long-term play.

Spec ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Dual EVO OC Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O
Chipset GeForce RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5080 Radeon RX 7900 XTX GeForce RTX 5080
Vram 12GB GDDR6X 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 24GB GDDR6 16GB GDDR7
Boost Clock Mhz 2555 2730 2482 2730 2680 2620
Tdp W 200 360 300 360 339 360
Memory Bus Bits 192 256 256 256 384 256
Ray Tracing true true true true true true
GPU Class consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AIRtVramRasterComputeFeatureThermalUser SentimentEfficiencyConnectivitySocial ProofAffordability
ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Dual EVO OC 58.270.159.273.56572.155.936.689.770.195.534.7
Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare 85.295.288.794.293.296.291.571.757.89488.814
MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare 79.292.285.688.88896.291.580.172.99488.821.1
ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare 85.297.588.794.293.296.291.599.457.89499.119.2
Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare 94.996.291.783.995.583.991.585.852.798.778.417.6
PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Compare 85.297.588.794.293.296.291.544.857.89482.618

Price

Value & Pricing

Here's where things get messy. The affordability score is in the 38th percentile, and the price spread across US listings is wild: USD 530 to USD 1,100. That's a USD 570 gap between the cheapest and most expensive listing for the same card. If you're shopping in the US, the USD 530 listing is the one to grab, and honestly, anything above USD 700 starts to feel like you're paying a premium for availability rather than performance. Canadian buyers face a similar spread, with prices ranging from CAD 830 to CAD 1,296, a CAD 466 difference. The CAD 830 listing is the clear value pick there. At the low end of those ranges, this card makes sense. At the high end, you're flirting with territory where a 4070 Ti or a used 4080 starts looking tempting.

Read more

Overview

The ASUS Dual RTX 4070 EVO OC posts a PassMark G3D score of 26,881, which lands it in the 73rd percentile for raster performance. That's a solid showing for a card aimed at 1080p and 1440p gaming, and it's backed by 12GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus. The 2.5-slot design and 227mm length make it one of the easier 4070s to squeeze into smaller cases, which is a real selling point if you're not running a full tower.

But here's the thing: user sentiment sits at the 37th percentile, and the affordability score is even lower at the 38th. Owners generally like the card once it's installed, but there's some grumbling about the price and confusion over the power connector. The photos on some listings show a 16-pin connector while the actual card uses a standard 8-pin. That's a listing problem, not a card problem, but it's the kind of thing that makes buyers nervous.

Common Questions

Q: What power connector does this card actually use?

It's a standard 8-pin connector. Some retailer listings show a 16-pin in the photos, which has caused confusion, but the actual card uses a single 8-pin. The 200W TDP means you don't need anything more exotic, and a 650W PSU is the recommended minimum.

Q: Will this fit in a small form factor case?

Probably, and that's one of its biggest strengths. At 227mm long and 2.5 slots thick, it's shorter than most RTX 4070 variants. The axial-tech fan design and 0dB technology also help with airflow in tighter spaces. Just make sure your case has clearance for the 2.5-slot width, since it's slightly thicker than a standard 2-slot card.

Q: Is 12GB of VRAM enough for 1440p gaming?

For most current games, yes. The 12GB of GDDR6X with 480 GB/s of bandwidth handles 1440p fine, and the 26,881 PassMark score backs that up. But VRAM capacity ranks in the 59th percentile for this category, which means it's about average. If you plan to keep the card for several years, games with heavy texture packs or high-resolution ray tracing could start pushing against that 12GB ceiling.

Who Should Skip This

If you're planning to game at 4K or want a card that will age gracefully over the next four or five years, this isn't it. The 12GB VRAM sits at the 59th percentile, and the AI performance is even weaker at the 58th percentile, which matters if you're doing any local model work or AI upscaling. The 51.1/100 AI LLM score is the weakest area of this card by a wide margin. And if you're paying anywhere near the USD 1,100 top end of the price range, you're getting fleeced. At that price, you're within striking distance of cards with 16GB of VRAM and significantly better ray tracing. This card makes sense for compact 1080p and 1440p builds at the low end of its price range, and not much else.

Verdict

The ASUS Dual RTX 4070 EVO OC is a capable 1080p and 1440p card that excels in efficiency and compact builds. The 26,881 PassMark score and 90th percentile efficiency are genuinely impressive for a 200W card. But the 37th percentile user sentiment and 38th percentile affordability scores tell a story of a product that's good but not great value. The 12GB VRAM is a real concern for longevity, and the price spread across vendors means you could easily overpay by hundreds of dollars if you're not careful. If you can find it near the USD 530 mark, it's a solid buy. If you're looking at the USD 1,100 end of the range, walk away and buy something with more VRAM.

Usage Scores

Overall (74.6)AI/LLM (51.5)Budget (85.2)Gaming 4k (68.3)Ray Tracing (73.9)Workstation (62.1)Gaming 1080p (84.5)Gaming 1440p (80.7)Content Creation (65.6)
  • Overall74.6
  • AI/LLM51.5
  • Budget85.2
  • Gaming 4k68.3
  • Ray Tracing73.9
  • Workstation62.1
  • Gaming 1080p84.5
  • Gaming 1440p80.7
  • Content Creation65.6

Other Configurations2

Similar Products