Acer EI242QR M 23.6" Black 2022
The 1500R curved VA panel with a 170Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time delivers smooth motion clarity for fast-paced games at a budget level. FreeSync Premium support and a 23.6-inch 1080p screen keep the experience tear-free without demanding a high-end GPU. This monitor is best for competitive gamers on a tight budget who prioritize speed and immersion over color accuracy or high brightness.
No current retailer price
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Acer EI242QR M gives you 170Hz and 1ms response time for $202 USD, which is genuinely fast for the price. But the display quality ranks in the 11th percentile, with 250-nit brightness and 85% NTSC color coverage that feel dim and washed out. It's a speed-focused budget monitor that trades visual quality for refresh rate.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 170Hz refresh rate is genuinely fast for the price 90th
- 1ms VRB response time keeps motion blur low 80th
- FreeSync Premium works over both HDMI and DisplayPort
- Curved VA panel offers better contrast than flat IPS alternatives
- Feature set ranks in the 90th percentile for this category
Cons
- 250-nit brightness is dim, especially in bright rooms
- Display quality ranks in the 11th percentile overall
- 85% NTSC color coverage is below average
- Only 2 video inputs: 1 HDMI and 1 DisplayPort
- Customer rating of 2.4/5 from just 3 reviews is a red flag
The proof
Performance
The headline spec is 170Hz, and that's genuinely solid for this price bracket. Combined with the 1ms VRB response time, you're getting motion clarity that lands in the 80th percentile for performance. For fast-paced shooters and competitive games, this monitor will keep up with your reflexes. FreeSync Premium is also here, which means variable refresh rate works over both HDMI and DisplayPort, so screen tearing shouldn't be a concern whether you're on an AMD or NVIDIA card.
But here's the catch: that 170Hz is driving a VA panel with a 250-nit backlight. VA panels are known for better contrast than IPS, and Acer claims a 100,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio, which sounds impressive until you realize that's a marketing number, not a real-world measurement. The actual brightness ceiling of 250 nits is below average for this category, and it'll feel dim next to a window or in a well-lit room. The 85% NTSC color coverage is also middle-of-the-road, so don't expect vibrant, saturated colors in games or movies.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 23.6" |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 (Full HD) |
| Panel Type | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved | Yes |
| Curvature | 1200 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 170 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 85% NTSC |
| Color Depth | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Tilt | Yes |
| Pivot | No |
| VESA Mount | 75x75 |
Features
| Power | 32 |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the EI242QR M is outclassed in almost every category except price. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG and MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 are OLED panels with vastly superior color, contrast, and brightness, but they cost several times more. The Samsung Odyssey G7 G75F offers a similar curved VA experience but with better brightness and a higher resolution. Even the LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B, while larger and more expensive, delivers a much better overall picture. The Acer's only real advantage is that 170Hz at $202 USD, which undercuts most competitors by a significant margin. But you get what you pay for: the display quality ranks in the 11th percentile, while the feature set ranks in the 90th. That's a weird combination, and it means this monitor is fast but not pretty.
| Spec | Acer EI242QR M 23.6" | LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B | ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG | Dell UltraSharp U4025QW | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 | Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 23.600000381469727 | 45 | 27 | 39.70000076293945 | 27 | 34 |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 5120 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | OLED | OLED | IPS | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 170 | 330 | 240 | 120 | 240 | 240 |
| Response Time Ms | 1 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 5 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | Adaptive-Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Hdr | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 600 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 400 True Black |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Color | Portability | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | Social Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acer EI242QR M 23.6" | 42.2 | 40 | 11.1 | 89.9 | 47.7 | 79.5 | 34.9 | 1.9 |
| LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B Compare | 99.4 | 76.6 | 99.7 | 95.8 | 90.9 | 99.4 | 96.9 | 94.7 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG Compare | 96.1 | 57.8 | 97.9 | 84 | 90.9 | 98 | 81.4 | 99.3 |
| Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Compare | 98.2 | 76.6 | 98.7 | 95.8 | 90.9 | 56 | 99.3 | 97.9 |
| MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare | 99.1 | 57.8 | 77.4 | 84 | 90.9 | 98 | 81.4 | 99.3 |
| Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW Compare | 99 | 73.9 | 85.8 | 89.9 | 90.9 | 98 | 95.4 | 97.9 |
Price
Value & Pricing
At $202 USD, the EI242QR M is priced like a budget monitor, and that's exactly what it is. You're paying for the 170Hz refresh rate and the 1ms response time, and those are the only two specs that justify the price tag. The display quality, color accuracy, and brightness are all below average, so you're essentially trading visual quality for speed. If you're a competitive gamer on a tight budget, that trade-off might be worth it. For everyone else, there are better-rounded options at similar prices. The CAD listing at $268 is less compelling, especially since you can often find IPS panels with better color and brightness in that range.
Read more
Overview
The Acer EI242QR M is a 23.6-inch curved VA panel that pushes 170Hz at 1080p, and on paper that sounds like a budget esports dream. The feature set lands in the 90th percentile for this category, which means it's packing more gaming-focused tech than most monitors in our database. But the display itself sits in the 11th percentile, and that's the number that tells the real story here. You're getting a fast refresh rate bolted onto a panel that struggles with brightness and color.
At $202 USD, this is clearly aimed at gamers who want high refresh rates without spending real money. And for that specific use case, it delivers. But the 250-nit brightness ceiling and 85% NTSC coverage mean this thing won't wow you in a bright room or with HDR content. The 2.4/5 customer rating from just 3 reviews also suggests early buyers aren't exactly thrilled.
Common Questions
Q: Is 250 nits bright enough for everyday use?
It depends on your room. 250 nits is below average for this category, and it'll feel dim in a bright room or near a window. For a dark gaming setup, it's workable, but don't expect HDR content to look impressive despite the HDR10 label. The brightness ceiling simply isn't there.
Q: Does FreeSync Premium work with NVIDIA graphics cards?
Yes. FreeSync Premium is AMD's variable refresh rate tech, but it works over both HDMI and DisplayPort, and NVIDIA cards can typically use it through G-Sync Compatible mode. You won't get official G-Sync certification, but in practice, variable refresh rate should work fine with most modern NVIDIA GPUs.
Q: Is the curved screen worth it at 23.6 inches?
At 23.6 inches, the curve is subtle and mostly a gimmick. Curved screens make more sense at larger sizes where the curve actually wraps around your field of view. Here, it's a minor aesthetic touch that won't meaningfully improve immersion. The VA panel's contrast is the real benefit, not the curve.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you care about picture quality at all. The 11th percentile display ranking isn't a fluke: 250 nits is dim, 85% NTSC is below average, and the 8-bit panel won't impress anyone who's used a decent IPS or OLED screen. If you do photo editing, watch movies in a bright room, or just want colors that pop, this monitor will disappoint. The 2.4/5 customer rating from 3 reviews also suggests early buyers found issues worth complaining about. And if you need more than two video inputs, the single HDMI and single DisplayPort will feel limiting fast.
Verdict
The Acer EI242QR M is a one-trick pony, and that trick is speed. If you're a competitive gamer who needs 170Hz and 1ms response time on a budget, this monitor delivers exactly that. But the 250-nit brightness, 85% NTSC color coverage, and 11th percentile display quality mean you're sacrificing a lot for that refresh rate. The 2.4/5 customer rating from 3 reviews doesn't inspire confidence either. At $202 USD, it's a reasonable entry point for esports, but most people will be happier spending a bit more on a monitor that doesn't feel like a compromise.
Usage Scores
- Overall34.7
- Gaming38.2
- Office27
- Creative23.5
- Portable22.3
- Professional22.8
- Entertainment35.2