Minolta MNCD245T Black
The three-channel recording system captures front, rear, and interior views simultaneously, with an infrared LED for nighttime in-cabin monitoring. Its built-in G-sensor automatically saves footage upon detecting a collision, providing essential evidence without manual intervention. This dash cam is best for rideshare drivers and commuters needing comprehensive, hands-free documentation of all angles around their vehicle.
Type compact
Video 1080p
17 Gesamtbewertung
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong affordability (74th percentile) 74th
Nachteile
- Below average sensor (0th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (17th percentile)
- Below average social proof (24th percentile)
- Below average video (25th percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Sensor
| Megapixels | 1 MP |
Video
| Max Resolution | 1080p |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 2.45" |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Minolta MNCD245T | Sony FX30 | Fujifilm X-H2 | Nikon Z Z9 | Panasonic Lumix G G9 II | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | compact | cinema | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | - | 26MP aps-c | 40.2MP aps-c | 45.7MP full-frame | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 32.5MP full-frame |
| AF Points | - | 495 | 425 | 493 | 779 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | - | 120 | 15 | 30 | 75 | 40 |
| Video | 1080p | 4K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 8K @120fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @120fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | - | 562 | 579 | 1160 | 575 | 608 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minolta MNCD245T | 38.3 | 39.9 | 35.1 | 33.9 | 24.7 | 0.1 | 47.1 | 29.6 | 17.1 | 23.5 | 74.1 | 35.9 |
| Sony FX30 Compare | 93.9 | 87.8 | 94.4 | 99.6 | 92.2 | 95.5 | 96.7 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 99.6 | 17.1 | 89.2 |
| Fujifilm X-H2 Compare | 92.3 | 96.9 | 94.5 | 82.2 | 95.4 | 99 | 97.8 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 94 | 24 | 96 |
| Nikon Z Z9 Compare | 93.6 | 92 | 99.4 | 95.4 | 98.7 | 70.9 | 98.1 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 94 | 8.7 | 89.2 |
| Panasonic Lumix G G9 II Compare | 98 | 91.8 | 94.5 | 96.2 | 97.6 | 63.9 | 91.9 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 89.3 | 22 | 89.2 |
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III Compare | 98.8 | 91.3 | 95.1 | 92.6 | 90.6 | 66.2 | 97.5 | 98.8 | 96.1 | 94 | 14.6 | 99.6 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt16.8
- Video13.1
- Travel9
- Youtube10.2
- Beginner41.7
- Vlogging5.7
- Streaming7.6
- Photography10.1
- Wedding Events11.6
- Sports Wildlife16.3
- Product Photography6.4
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
