Neu
Hoorola CS05 Black
Type compact
Sensor 80MP 1/2.3-inch
AF Points 1 pts
Burst 3 fps
Video 5K @30fps
Weight 227 g
33 Gesamtbewertung
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile) 93rd
- Strong sensor (88th percentile) 88th
- Strong video (79th percentile) 79th
- Strong display (73rd percentile) 73rd
Nachteile
- Below average battery (0th percentile)
- Below average af (1st percentile)
- Below average build (7th percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Sensor
| Type | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch" |
| Megapixels | 80 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 |
Autofocus
| AF Points | 1 |
Shooting
| Burst (Mechanical) | 3 |
| Burst (Electronic) | 10 |
Video
| Max Resolution | 5K |
| 4K FPS | 30 |
| 1080p FPS | 60 |
| Log Profile | Yes |
| Codec | H.264 |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 2.8" |
| Touchscreen | No |
| Articulating | Yes |
Build
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
| Battery Life | 80 |
Connectivity
| USB | USB-C |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Hoorola CS05 | Sony FX30 | Fujifilm X-H2 | Nikon Z Z9 | Panasonic Lumix G G9 II | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | compact | cinema | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 80MP 1/2.3-inch | 26MP aps-c | 40.2MP aps-c | 45.7MP full-frame | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 32.5MP full-frame |
| AF Points | 1 | 495 | 425 | 493 | 779 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | 3 | 120 | 15 | 30 | 75 | 40 |
| Video | 5K @30fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 8K @120fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @120fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 227 | 562 | 579 | 1160 | 575 | 608 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoorola CS05 | 0.6 | 39.9 | 7.2 | 68.4 | 79.3 | 88.2 | 0.3 | 72.6 | 42.2 | 53.4 | 93 | 35.9 |
| Sony FX30 Compare | 93.9 | 87.8 | 94.4 | 99.6 | 92.2 | 95.5 | 96.7 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 99.6 | 17 | 89.2 |
| Fujifilm X-H2 Compare | 92.3 | 96.9 | 94.5 | 82.2 | 95.4 | 99 | 97.8 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 93.9 | 24 | 96 |
| Nikon Z Z9 Compare | 93.6 | 92 | 99.4 | 95.4 | 98.7 | 70.9 | 98.1 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 93.9 | 8.7 | 89.2 |
| Panasonic Lumix G G9 II Compare | 98 | 91.8 | 94.5 | 96.2 | 97.6 | 63.9 | 91.9 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 89.3 | 22 | 89.2 |
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III Compare | 98.8 | 91.3 | 95.1 | 92.6 | 90.6 | 66.2 | 97.5 | 98.8 | 96.1 | 93.9 | 14.6 | 99.6 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt33.3
- Video38.6
- Travel25.8
- Youtube46.6
- Beginner64
- Vlogging38.7
- Streaming38
- Photography31.3
- Wedding Events28.7
- Sports Wildlife25.2
- Product Photography48.5
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
