Canon EOS R50 Forest Green
The 24.2MP sensor and Eye AF deliver sharp, reliable stills in a compact body, though the 1/2.3-inch sensor and lack of stabilization limit low-light and handheld video performance. Its bundled 18-45mm lens and included shoulder bag make it a ready-to-shoot, portable kit right out of the box. This camera is best for casual photographers who prioritize an easy-to-carry setup for everyday snapshots over advanced video features.
Type mirrorless
Sensor 24.2MP 1/2.3-inch
AF Points 651 pts
Video 4K @30fps
Weight 1542 g
39 Gesamtbewertung
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong af (96th percentile) 96th
Nachteile
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Sensor
| Type | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch" |
| Megapixels | 24.2 MP |
| Processor | DIGIC X |
Autofocus
| AF Points | 651 |
| Eye AF | Yes |
| Animal AF | Yes |
| Subject Detection | Yes |
Shooting
| Electronic Shutter | Yes |
Video
| Max Resolution | 4K |
| 4K FPS | 30 |
Build
| Weather Sealed | No |
| Weight | 1.5 kg / 3.4 lbs |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Canon EOS R50 | Sony FX30 | Fujifilm X-H2 | Nikon Z Z9 | Panasonic Lumix G G9 II | OM System OM-1 Mark II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | mirrorless | cinema | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 24.2MP 1/2.3-inch | 26MP aps-c | 40.2MP aps-c | 45.7MP full-frame | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds |
| AF Points | 651 | 495 | 425 | 493 | 779 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | - | 120 | 15 | 30 | 75 | 120 |
| Video | 4K @30fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 8K @120fps | 4K @120fps | 4K @60fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 1542 | 562 | 579 | 1160 | 575 | 511 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon EOS R50 | 95.6 | 39.9 | 61.3 | 33.9 | 62.8 | 58 | 47.1 | 29.6 | 35.5 | 37.4 | 46 | 35.9 |
| Sony FX30 Compare | 93.9 | 87.8 | 94.4 | 99.6 | 92.2 | 95.5 | 96.7 | 87.6 | 96.1 | 99.6 | 17 | 89.2 |
| Fujifilm X-H2 Compare | 92.3 | 96.9 | 94.5 | 82.2 | 95.4 | 99 | 97.8 | 87.6 | 96.1 | 93.9 | 24 | 96 |
| Nikon Z Z9 Compare | 93.6 | 92 | 99.4 | 95.4 | 98.7 | 70.9 | 98.1 | 87.6 | 96.1 | 93.9 | 8.7 | 89.2 |
| Panasonic Lumix G G9 II Compare | 98 | 91.8 | 94.5 | 96.2 | 97.6 | 63.9 | 91.9 | 87.6 | 96.1 | 89.3 | 22 | 89.2 |
| OM System OM-1 Mark II Compare | 98.8 | 99.8 | 91.4 | 99.6 | 85.2 | 51.7 | 96 | 87.6 | 96.1 | 89.3 | 21.9 | 99.6 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt38.7
- Video40.2
- Travel26
- Youtube31.8
- Beginner50.9
- Vlogging23.6
- Streaming30.5
- Photography45.2
- Wedding Events38.3
- Sports Wildlife40
- Product Photography38.2
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
