NVIDIA RTX A400 4GB GDDR6 workstation Black
The Ampere-based RTX A400 delivers hardware-accelerated ray tracing and 768 CUDA cores in a compact, single-slot, 163mm design with a 50W TDP that requires no external power. Its low-profile, blower-cooled form factor and four Mini DisplayPort 1.4a outputs make it a practical choice for driving multi-display digital signage or financial trading setups. This card is best for entry-level workstation users needing certified drivers for basic 3D modeling and CAD, not for gaming or heavy content creation.
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong affordability (85th percentile) 85th
- Strong efficiency (83rd percentile) 83rd
Nachteile
- Below average compute (4th percentile)
- Below average ai (11th percentile)
- Below average rt (15th percentile)
- Below average vram (16th percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 2 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | RTX A400 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ampere |
| Class | workstation |
Memory
| VRAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 64 |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 768 |
| Tensor Cores | 24 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 5983 |
| GPU Compute | 2558 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 50 |
| Power Connectors | No |
| Cooler | Blower |
| Fans | 1 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 4 |
| HDMI | 0 |
| USB-C | 0 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 4096 x 2160 |
Physical
| Length | 163 |
| Slot Width | 1 |
| Form Factor | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.0 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | NVIDIA RTX A400 | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 4GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | - | 2407 | 2730 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 50 | 575 | 360 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 64 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA RTX A400 | 10.8 | 15.3 | 16.1 | 16.2 | 4.2 | 34.5 | 20.5 | 83.4 | 49.2 | 37.5 | 84.8 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.2 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.7 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare | 85.3 | 95.2 | 88.8 | 94.3 | 93.3 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.9 | 94.1 | 88.8 | 13.8 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.3 | 92.2 | 85.7 | 88.8 | 88.1 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 94.1 | 88.8 | 21.2 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.8 | 94.3 | 93.3 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.9 | 94.1 | 99.1 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.2 | 91.7 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.7 | 98.8 | 78.4 | 17.4 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt27.1
- AI/LLM8.5
- Budget52.8
- Gaming 4k10.1
- Ray Tracing12.4
- Workstation23.1
- Gaming 1080p22.6
- Gaming 1440p16.4
- Content Creation16.1
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
