Preissenkung 3%

PNY Quadro T400 4GB GDDR6 workstation

★★★★★ 4.7 (42)

The 30W TDP Quadro T400 chip delivers certified ISV stability and triple 5120 x 2880px display support without external power connectors. Its compact single-slot design and 4GB of GDDR6 memory make it a reliable drop-in upgrade backed by a 3-year warranty. This card is best for financial traders and office professionals running multi-monitor 2D applications who need rock-solid driver support, not 3D rendering.

GPU Quadro T400
VRAM 4GB GDDR6
Boost Clock 2000 MHz
TDP 30 W
Memory Bus 64 bit
Class workstation
PNY Quadro T400 4GB GDDR6 workstation gpu
30 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

The 30-Second Version

The T400 posts a PassMark G3D of 3618, which is below average for raster performance, but its 30W TDP and 84th percentile efficiency make it a standout for low-power workstations. It drives three Mini DisplayPort outputs at up to 5120 x 2880, which is the real selling point. Just don't expect it to game, the 4K gaming score of 9.8/100 is rough.

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • 30W TDP with 84th percentile efficiency, barely sips power 84th
  • Three Mini DisplayPort outputs for multi-monitor setups 80th
  • 4GB GDDR6 with 2000MHz boost clock handles workstation tasks fine 67th
  • PassMark G3D of 3618 is adequate for non-gaming workloads
  • 3-year manufacturer warranty included

Nachteile

  • 4GB VRAM on a 64-bit bus puts it in the 16th percentile for memory
  • Gaming 4K score of 9.8/100 is a real letdown
  • Raster performance in the 14th percentile, below average
  • User sentiment score of 33rd percentile, limited review data
  • Connectivity and thermal rankings both below the 40th percentile

Was Besitzer sagen

The Word on the Street

4.7/5 (42 reviews)
👍 Multiple owners praise the card for running cool and quiet in home lab and server setups, with one noting it was detected immediately for VM passthrough.
👍 Buyers appreciate the low price and the fact that it handles multi-monitor workstation tasks without needing a beefy power supply.
🤔 Some potential buyers are left with unanswered questions about warranty details and cross-platform compatibility, which is frustrating given the thin review pool.

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
73/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysegeringe Konfidenz · 5 Quellen · Juni 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '24: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 1 Bewertung1121Q3 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q4 '25
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen

Basierend auf 5 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Performance

Let's be real about what the T400 is and isn't. The 2000MHz boost clock and 4GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus give it enough muscle for desktop work, CAD viewing, and light rendering, but the PassMark G3D score of 3618 puts it in the 14th percentile for raster performance. That's below average, and it means this card will choke on anything resembling modern gaming. The 4K gaming score of 9.8/100 is one of the worst we've seen in that category.

Where it earns its keep is efficiency. The 30W TDP with a single fan puts it in the 84th percentile for efficiency, which is genuinely impressive. You can drop this into a compact workstation or home server and it'll stay cool and quiet. The three Mini DisplayPort outputs are the practical highlight, supporting up to 5120 x 2880 per display. For multi-monitor productivity, that's a solid setup. Just don't expect ray tracing or AI workloads to go anywhere fast, those sit at the 12th and 10th percentiles respectively.

Performance Percentiles

AI 9.6
Rt 12.1
Vram 15.9
Raster 13.6
Feature 11.1
Thermal 26.2
User Sentiment 33.3
Efficiency 84
Connectivity 30.8
Nutzerresonanz 67.2
Affordability 80.1

Specifications

Full Specifications

Chipset

GPU Chipset Quadro T400
Brand NVIDIA
Class workstation

Memory

VRAM 4 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 64

Compute

Base Clock 2000
Boost Clock 2000

Performance

PassMark G3D 3618
GPU Compute 1528

Power & Cooling

TDP 30
Cooler Single Fan
Fans 1

Connectivity

Interface PCI Express 3.0
DisplayPort 3
HDMI 0
USB-C 0
Max Resolution 7680 x 4320

Physical

Weight 0.3 kg / 0.7 lbs

vs Competition

Stacked against the current crop of RTX 5070 cards like the ASUS PRIME RTX 5070 12G, ZOTAC Solid OC, MSI SHADOW, and Gigabyte Eagle OC, the T400 is in a completely different league, and not in a good way for raw performance. Those cards have 12GB of VRAM and modern architectures, while the T400 has 4GB on a 64-bit bus. But that's not a fair fight. The T400 costs a fraction of what those cards go for and uses a fraction of the power. The XFX RX 7900 XT is similarly out of reach in performance terms. The real comparison is against other entry-level workstation cards, where the T400's efficiency and multi-monitor support make it a reasonable choice, but the 16th percentile VRAM ranking means it'll age faster than cards with more memory headroom.

Spec PNY Quadro T400 ASUS PRIME PRIME-RTX5070TI-16G ZOTAC SOLID SFF OC ZT-B50710J3-10P MSI GAMING TRIO G5070-12GTC Sapphire NITRO+ 11348-01-20G XFX Mercury RX-97TRGBBB9
Chipset Quadro T400 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
Vram 4GB GDDR6 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 12GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR6 16GB GDDR6
Boost Clock Mhz 2000 2482 2482 2610 3060 3100
Tdp W 30 300 300 250 304 304
Memory Bus Bits 64 256 256 192 256 256
Ray Tracing - true true true true true
GPU Class workstation consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AIRtVramRasterFeatureThermalUser SentimentEfficiencyConnectivityNutzerresonanzAffordability
PNY Quadro T400 9.612.115.913.611.126.233.38430.867.280.1
ASUS PRIME PRIME-RTX5070TI-16G Compare 79.492.385.888.989.591.544.97394.195.620
ZOTAC SOLID SFF OC ZT-B50710J3-10P Compare 79.492.385.888.996.291.507394.182.823.6
MSI GAMING TRIO G5070-12GTC Compare 6282.865.479.896.291.580.379.494.195.630.1
Sapphire NITRO+ 11348-01-20G Compare 89.584.774.175.996.291.580.346.188.88936.2
XFX Mercury RX-97TRGBBB9 Compare 89.284.775.775.996.272.39646.194.195.640.7

Preis

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place depending on where you shop. In the US, you're looking at USD 249 to USD 285 across two listings, which is a USD 36 spread for the exact same card. That's worth shopping around for. In Europe, the gap is even wider, EUR 300 to EUR 472 across four listings in Germany, Spain, France, and Italy. A EUR 172 difference is not pocket change. The affordability ranking sits at the 80th percentile, which means this card is priced competitively for what it is, but the value proposition only holds if you actually need the Quadro driver support and multi-monitor outputs. If you're just looking for a cheap display adapter, there are cheaper options that'll do the job.

Ab 310 € 1 Angebot bei 1 Händler
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 310 €

Price History

260 € 280 € 300 € 320 € 8. Juni5. Nov. 310 €

Mehr erfahren

Overview

The PNY Quadro T400 is a 30W workstation card with 4GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, and it posts a PassMark G3D score of 3618. That puts it in the 14th percentile for raster performance in our database, which sounds rough until you remember this thing sips power like a laptop and still drives three Mini DisplayPort outputs at up to 5120 x 2880. It's not built to game, and the 9.8/100 gaming_4k score makes that painfully clear. It's built to sit in a quiet workstation or home lab and handle multi-monitor productivity without melting your power bill.

Our budget score lands at 54.9/100, which is middle of the pack, and the workstation score is 34.3/100. The efficiency ranking is the real story here, sitting in the 84th percentile. That's a strong showing for a card that doesn't even need external power. But the user sentiment score of 33rd percentile is a red flag, mostly because there just aren't enough reviews to build confidence. The 4.7-star average from 42 reviews is nice, but the sample size is thin.

Common Questions

Q: Can the Quadro T400 handle gaming?

Not really. The PassMark G3D score of 3618 puts it in the 14th percentile for raster performance, and the 4K gaming score is 9.8/100. It'll run older or less demanding titles at low settings, but this card is designed for workstation tasks, not gaming.

Q: How many monitors can I connect to the T400?

You can connect up to three monitors using the three Mini DisplayPort outputs. Each port supports resolutions up to 5120 x 2880, so multi-monitor productivity setups are well within reach.

Q: Does the T400 need external power?

No. The card has a 30W TDP and draws all its power from the PCI Express 3.0 slot. That's part of why it ranks in the 84th percentile for efficiency, it's a great fit for compact builds and systems with limited power headroom.

Who Should Skip This

If you're a gamer, skip this. The 9.8/100 gaming 4K score and 14th percentile raster performance mean you'll be disappointed the moment you launch anything modern. If you need VRAM for rendering or AI workloads, the 4GB on a 64-bit bus puts this card in the 16th percentile for memory, which is a weak spot that'll only get more limiting over time. And if you're building a system where thermals matter, the 26th percentile thermal ranking suggests the single-fan cooler isn't exactly a standout. This is a card for a specific use case, and if you're outside that use case, your money is better spent elsewhere.

Verdict

The PNY Quadro T400 is a niche card that does its niche well. If you need a low-power, multi-monitor workstation card with Quadro driver support, it's a solid pick, especially given the 84th percentile efficiency and 80th percentile affordability. But the 14th percentile raster performance and 9.8/100 gaming 4K score mean it's not a card for gamers or anyone doing serious rendering. The 4.7-star rating from 42 reviews is encouraging, but the 33rd percentile user sentiment score tells us there just isn't enough data to be fully confident. For the right use case, it's a good buy. For everyone else, look elsewhere.

Usage Scores

Gesamt (30.4)AI/LLM (11.7)Budget (52.3)Gaming 4k (9.8)Ray Tracing (11.2)Workstation (34.2)Gaming 1080p (22.3)Gaming 1440p (15.9)Content Creation (23)
  • Gesamt30.4
  • AI/LLM11.7
  • Budget52.3
  • Gaming 4k9.8
  • Ray Tracing11.2
  • Workstation34.2
  • Gaming 1080p22.3
  • Gaming 1440p15.9
  • Content Creation23

Ähnliche Produkte