ASRock Phantom Gaming PG32QF2B 32" Black 2023
Das 31,5-Zoll VA-Panel bietet 550 Nits Helligkeit, eine 165Hz-Bildwiederholrate und eine integrierte WLAN-Antenne für besseren Empfang. Die 92% DCI-P3-Farbraumabdeckung und der voll einstellbare Standfuß sorgen für Vielseitigkeit am Arbeitsplatz. Der Monitor eignet sich für Gamer, die ein reaktionsschnelles 165Hz-Display mit FreeSync Premium und integriertem WLAN-Antennenanschluss suchen.
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
The 30-Second Version
The ASRock PG32QF2B is a 31.5-inch QHD gaming monitor with a 165Hz refresh rate and 550 nits of brightness. It delivers a big screen and smooth refresh rate, but falls short on color accuracy, ergonomics, and connectivity. Most buyers will find better options at similar prices.
Pros & Cons
Vorteile
- 165Hz refresh rate is smooth for gaming 95th
- 550 nits brightness works in bright rooms 89th
- Large 31.5-inch QHD screen gives plenty of real estate 77th
- VA panel delivers strong contrast and deep blacks 75th
- FreeSync Premium support for AMD GPU owners
Nachteile
- Color accuracy ranks near the bottom of our database
- Ergonomics are a real weak spot
- Connectivity options are extremely limited
- Performance scores land in the bottom quarter overall
- Built-in speakers are likely an afterthought
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 33 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Performance
The PG32QF2B runs at 165Hz, which is smooth enough for most gamers. You'll notice the difference immediately if you're coming from a 60Hz or 75Hz panel. FreeSync Premium keeps things tear-free with AMD GPUs, and the 550 nit brightness means the screen stays visible in brighter rooms. But that's where the good news mostly ends.
Our benchmark data puts this monitor's performance in the bottom quarter of all displays we've tested. The VA panel has the typical VA strengths, like good contrast and deep blacks, but it also brings the usual VA weaknesses. Motion clarity suffers compared to IPS or OLED panels, and you'll see some smearing in fast scenes. The response time isn't listed as a highlight, which usually means it's nothing to write home about. For a monitor with "Gaming" in the name, the performance numbers are underwhelming. It's playable, sure, but it's not going to impress anyone who's used a faster panel.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 32" |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 (QHD) |
| Panel Type | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved | No |
| Screen Finish | matte |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 550 nits |
| Color Gamut | 92% DCI-P3 / sRGB 116% |
| Color Depth | 8-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| Speakers | Yes |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | Yes |
| Tilt | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes |
| Pivot | No |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 |
Features
| Power | 45 |
| Weight | 11.3 kg / 25.0 lbs |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the PG32QF2B has a rough time. The Samsung Odyssey G60SD is a QD-OLED panel that absolutely destroys this monitor in color accuracy and response time. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG is smaller at 27 inches but runs 4K and offers far better overall quality. Even the Alienware AW3425DW, despite being an ultrawide, delivers a more premium experience in every measurable way.
The LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B is in a completely different league, though it costs significantly more. The MSI MPG 271QR QD-OLED X50 is probably the closest competitor in spirit, a gaming-focused display that actually delivers on its promises. The ASRock's main advantage is price, and even that isn't a huge gap once you factor in what you're losing. If you can stretch your budget even a little, any of these alternatives will serve you better in the long run.
| Spec | ASRock Phantom Gaming PG32QF2B 32" | LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B | ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG | Dell UltraSharp U4025QW | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 | Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 32 | 45 | 27 | 39.70000076293945 | 27 | 34 |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 5120 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | OLED | OLED | IPS | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 165 | 330 | 240 | 120 | 240 | 240 |
| Response Time Ms | 1 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 5 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | Adaptive-Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Hdr | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 600 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 400 True Black |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Color | Mobilität | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Phantom Gaming PG32QF2B 32" | 95.2 | 21.1 | 74.7 | 67.8 | 73.7 | 77.2 | 62.9 | 89.4 |
| LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B Compare | 99.4 | 76.6 | 99.7 | 95.8 | 90.8 | 99.4 | 96.9 | 94.7 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG Compare | 96.1 | 57.7 | 97.9 | 84 | 90.8 | 98 | 81.4 | 99.3 |
| Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Compare | 98.2 | 76.6 | 98.7 | 95.8 | 90.8 | 56 | 99.3 | 98 |
| MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare | 99.1 | 57.7 | 77.4 | 84 | 90.8 | 98 | 81.4 | 99.3 |
| Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW Compare | 99 | 73.9 | 85.8 | 89.9 | 90.8 | 98 | 95.4 | 98 |
Preis
Value & Pricing
Pricing for the ASRock PG32QF2B sits at R$2,649 in Brazil, which puts it in a tricky spot. That's not cheap enough to be a budget pick, and it's not good enough to justify spending more. For similar money, you can find monitors with better color accuracy, better ergonomics, and more connectivity options. The LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B and Samsung Odyssey G60SD both cost more but deliver dramatically better performance. If you're strictly limited to this price range, the PG32QF2B gives you a big screen and high refresh rate, but you're accepting compromises in nearly every other category. It's a case of getting what you pay for, and sometimes not even that.
Mehr erfahren
Overview
The ASRock PG32QF2B is a 31.5-inch QHD gaming monitor that sits in that awkward middle ground between budget and premium. You get a 2560x1440 VA panel with a 165Hz refresh rate and 550 nits of brightness, which sounds decent on paper. But our database tells a different story. This thing lands in the bottom third for display quality, performance, and features compared to other monitors we've tested.
Is the ASRock PG32QF2B good for gaming? Sort of. The 165Hz refresh rate and FreeSync Premium support mean it'll handle fast-paced games without tearing, and the VA panel gives you deep blacks for darker scenes. But the overall performance score of 14.5 out of 100 for gaming puts it well behind what you'd expect from a monitor marketed under the Phantom Gaming banner. The color accuracy is a weak spot too, landing near the bottom of our rankings.
At around R$2,649 in Brazil, this monitor is competing against some seriously capable alternatives. The problem is that most of those alternatives do nearly everything better. If you're shopping for a large QHD gaming display and this is what fits your budget, it'll work. But you should know exactly what you're giving up before you commit.
Common Questions
Q: Is the ASRock PG32QF2B good for gaming?
It's decent for casual gaming thanks to the 165Hz refresh rate and FreeSync Premium support, but the VA panel's motion clarity and the monitor's overall performance scores put it behind most competitors in its class.
Q: Does the ASRock PG32QF2B have good color accuracy?
No, color accuracy is one of the weakest aspects of this monitor. It ranks near the bottom of our database for color performance, so it's not a great choice for photo editing or color-critical work.
Q: What are the best alternatives to the ASRock PG32QF2B?
The Samsung Odyssey G60SD, ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG, and Alienware AW3425DW all offer significantly better performance. The MSI MPG 271QR QD-OLED X50 is another strong option if you want a gaming-focused display that actually delivers.
Q: Is the ASRock PG32QF2B worth the price?
At R$2,649 in Brazil, it's hard to recommend. The monitor's weaknesses in color, ergonomics, and connectivity make it a questionable value when competitors offer much better overall quality for not much more money.
Who Should Skip This
Skip the PG32QF2B if you care about color accuracy, since it ranks near the bottom of our database. Content creators, photo editors, and anyone doing color-sensitive work should look elsewhere. If you need good ergonomics, like height adjustment or pivot, this monitor's poor ergonomic scores will frustrate you. And if you rely on multiple inputs or USB hubs, the extremely limited connectivity is a dealbreaker. For competitive gamers who need fast response times and minimal motion blur, a QD-OLED like the Samsung Odyssey G60SD or MSI MPG 271QR will serve you far better. This monitor is really only for budget-conscious buyers who want a big QHD screen and don't care about much else.
Verdict
Should you buy the ASRock PG32QF2B? Probably not, unless you're getting a significant discount. The 165Hz refresh rate and large QHD screen are nice, but they're not enough to overcome the monitor's weaknesses in color, ergonomics, and connectivity. This is a display that checks a few boxes on a spec sheet without excelling at anything.
If you're a casual gamer who just wants a big screen with a high refresh rate and doesn't care about color accuracy or adjustability, this monitor will do the job. But most people shopping in this price range have better options available. The PG32QF2B feels like a monitor designed to hit a price point rather than deliver a great experience. And in a market this competitive, that's just not enough.
Usage Scores
- Gesamt70.7
- Gaming68.1
- Office67.1
- Creative71.7
- Portable8.2
- Professional70.9
- Entertainment61.3