NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada 16GB GDDR6 workstation Black
The 4nm Ada Lovelace GPU delivers 2816 CUDA cores, 16GB of ECC GDDR6 memory, and 12 FP32 TFLOPS in a 70W TDP, making it a low-power workstation card that fits in compact 168mm dual-slot builds. Its 4x DP 1.4a outputs, AV1 encode, and ray tracing support add versatility for multi-display and content creation workflows, while the blower design suits dense systems. Best for professionals running CAD, simulation, or AI inference tasks that need ECC reliability and quiet operation in a small form factor workstation.
Overzicht
The 30-Second Version
The RTX 2000 Ada is a 70W workstation card with 16GB of ECC memory and a half-height design. Efficiency is best-in-class, but ray tracing and raster performance are below average. Worth it only if you need ECC and compact size for pro workloads.
Pros & Cons
Pluspunten
- 70W TDP is insanely efficient for this class of card 99th
- 16GB of ECC memory is a lifesaver for pro workloads 67th
- Half-height design fits in compact workstations 67th
- Four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs drive up to four 4K displays
Minpunten
- Ray tracing performance is a real weak spot
- Raster performance lands below average for the price
- Thermals run hot relative to the low power draw
- No HDMI output, so older monitors need adapters
De feiten
Performance
The spec sheet sounds decent on paper: 2816 CUDA cores, 12 TFLOPS of FP32, and a 2130MHz boost clock. But the PassMark G3D score of 16973 tells the real story. That's solidly middle-of-the-pack, and our raster score lands at the 39th percentile. Ray tracing is the weakest area at 29.4 out of 100, so don't expect this to chew through RT workloads. The 70W TDP is the star here. You're getting Ada efficiency in a card that can live in a tiny case without melting anything. The 16GB of ECC memory is a nice touch for anyone working with large datasets where a flipped bit is a disaster, not an inconvenience.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | RTX 2000 Ada |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace |
| Class | workstation |
| Process | 4 |
Memory
| VRAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 128 |
| Bandwidth | 256 |
| ECC | Yes |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 2816 |
| Tensor Cores | 88 |
| RT Cores | 22 |
| Base Clock | 1620 |
| Boost Clock | 2130 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 12 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 12 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 16973 |
| GPU Compute | 7874 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 70 |
| Recommended PSU | 250 |
| Power Connectors | No |
| Cooler | Fan |
| Fans | 2 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 4 |
| HDMI | 0 |
| USB-C | 0 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 4K |
Physical
| Length | 168 |
| Slot Width | 2 |
| Form Factor | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| AV1 Encode | Yes |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the RTX 2000 Ada is playing a different game. The ASUS PRIME RTX 5080 and Gigabyte AERO RTX 5080 are in a completely different performance universe, but they're also full-size cards that pull 300W plus. The MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti is closer in spirit but still a desktop card. The real comparison is against other low-profile workstation cards, and there aren't many with this combination of ECC memory and Ada architecture. Against consumer cards, it loses on performance. Against other pro cards, it wins on efficiency and size.
| Spec | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | RTX 2000 Ada | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 16GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2130 | 2407 | 2805 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 70 | 575 | 360 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 128 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Gebruikersoordeel | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada | 67 | 36.3 | 66.8 | 38.6 | 31.1 | 63.2 | 32.8 | 99.4 | 62.5 | 63.1 | 41.4 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.6 |
| Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD Compare | 85.3 | 95.2 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94.1 | 88.8 | 15.9 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 88 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 94.1 | 88.8 | 21.2 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94.1 | 99.1 | 19.2 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.2 | 91.7 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.7 | 98.8 | 78.4 | 17.5 |
Prijs
Value & Pricing
This is where things get tricky. The card lists at $829 USD, and for that money you could grab a consumer RTX 5070 Ti or even a used RTX 4080 that would absolutely smoke this thing in raw performance. But those cards don't have ECC memory, they don't fit in half-height slots, and they pull way more power. You're paying for the form factor and the pro feature set, not the frame rate. If you need those things, the price is fair. If you don't, it's a terrible deal.
Amazon 1 aanbieding Vanaf € 1.050
Price History
Lees meer
Overview
The RTX 2000 Ada is a weird one. It's a workstation card crammed into a half-height, 70W package, and it's aimed at people who need ECC memory and pro-level stability more than raw gaming muscle. The headline here is efficiency. This thing sips power while still packing 16GB of GDDR6 and a full Ada Lovelace feature set.
But let's be real about the scores. Our database puts it at 43.7 out of 100 overall, which is not a barn burner. It's a specialist tool. If you're building a compact workstation for CAD, simulation, or light AI work, it makes sense. If you want to game or do heavy rendering, you're looking at the wrong card.
Common Questions
Q: Can this card handle 4K gaming?
Not really. The PassMark G3D score of 16973 puts it below average for raster performance, and ray tracing is even weaker. It'll run older or less demanding titles at 4K, but modern AAA games will struggle.
Q: Does the ECC memory actually matter for my workload?
It depends. ECC corrects single-bit memory errors, which matters for long-running simulations, financial modeling, or any task where a silent data corruption could be catastrophic. For gaming or casual use, you won't notice a difference.
Q: Will this fit in a standard desktop case?
Yes, it's a half-height, dual-slot card at 168mm long, so it fits in almost anything. But the four DisplayPort outputs mean you'll need DP monitors or adapters if your displays only have HDMI.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're a gamer or a 3D artist who needs real ray tracing muscle. The RT performance is one of the weakest we've seen in this class, and for $829 you can get a consumer card that runs circles around it. Also skip it if you don't need ECC memory or the half-height form factor, because you're paying a premium for features you'll never use.
Verdict
Buy this if you're building a compact workstation for CAD, simulation, or light AI inference where ECC memory and low power draw matter more than raw speed. It's a niche card for a niche audience, and it nails that niche. Everyone else should look at consumer cards and pocket the difference.
Usage Scores
- Algemeen56.9
- AI/LLM52
- Budget51.9
- Gaming 4k36.2
- Ray Tracing35.8
- Workstation62.3
- Gaming 1080p44.2
- Gaming 1440p41
- Content Creation46.1