Intel Xeon E5 E5-2620 v3 6-core LGA2011-3
The 6-core, 12-thread Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports up to 768GB of DDR4 ECC memory, making it a reliable foundation for memory-intensive server tasks. Its 85W TDP and LGA2011-3 socket offer a cost-effective entry point for refurbished dual-socket workstation builds. This processor is best for home lab enthusiasts running virtualized environments or NAS systems where data integrity and uptime matter more than raw clock speed.
概览
The 30-Second Version
The E5-2620 v3 scores 7743 in multi-thread PassMark, which is solid for a used server chip that can be had for as little as USD 49. Single-thread performance is weak at 1689, and gaming is a lost cause at 23.7/100. Buy it for cheap ECC server builds, not for anything that needs per-core speed.
Pros & Cons
优点
- Multi-thread PassMark of 7743 is solid for the price 91st
- Supports up to 768GB of ECC DDR4 memory 72nd
- 85W TDP is efficient for a 6-core server chip
- 15MB L3 cache handles memory-heavy workloads well
- Dual-socket capable via 8 GT/s QPI
缺点
- Single-thread PassMark of 1689 is well below average
- Gaming score of 23.7/100 is a real letdown
- 2.4GHz base clock feels sluggish for desktop use
- Feature set ranks in the bottom 20% of our database
- Requires LGA2011-3 boards, which are aging and harder to find
实测数据
Performance
The multi-thread PassMark score of 7743 is the headline number here. That's solidly middle of the pack in our database, which sounds unimpressive until you remember this thing launched over a decade ago and costs less than a pizza dinner for two. The 12 threads help with virtualization and parallel workloads, and the 15MB of L3 cache gives it enough breathing room for database tasks and file serving. The 8 GT/s QPI link also means dual-socket boards can pair two of these without choking on interconnect bandwidth.
Single-thread performance is where the age really shows. A 1689 PassMark single-thread score puts it well below average, and that 2.4GHz base clock means latency-sensitive tasks feel sluggish. The 3.2GHz boost helps a bit, but this is not a chip you want for anything that depends on raw per-core speed. Gaming is a lost cause, our scoring puts it at 23.7 out of 100, which is one of the weakest results we've seen for that use case. Keep this chip in the server room where it belongs.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Xeon |
| Model | E5-2620 v3 |
| Class | server |
| Process | 22 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 6 |
| Threads | 12 |
| Base Clock | 2400 |
| Boost Clock | 3200 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 1.5 |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 7743 |
| PassMark Single | 1689 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 8000 |
| Max Memory | 768 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA2011-3 |
| TDP | 85 |
vs Competition
Against something like the AMD Ryzen 5 7600, this Xeon gets absolutely demolished in single-thread performance and gaming. The Ryzen 5 is a modern desktop chip with vastly better per-core speed, but it also costs several times more and doesn't support ECC memory on most boards. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is a closer comparison, another used server part, but with fewer cores and a higher clock. The E5-2620 v3 wins on multi-thread throughput and memory capacity, while the E5-2637 V2 might edge it out in single-thread tasks. For pure budget server builds, the E5-2620 v3 is the better value in most cases.
| Spec | Intel Xeon E5 E5-2620 v3 | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr | be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | DAKboard CPU v4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 12 | 32 | - | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 24 | 64 | - | 4 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3200 | 5600 | 3500 | - | 3400 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 15 | 64 | 256 | - | 8 | - |
| Tdp W | 85 | 170 | 200 | - | 270 | - |
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | AM5 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | - | AM4 | BGA |
| Integrated Graphics | - | AMD Radeon Graphics | No | - | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 产品 | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | 用户口碑 | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5 E5-2620 v3 | 55.7 | 20.6 | 72.3 | 53.6 | 54.8 | 53.1 | 91 | 41.4 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Compare | 93.8 | 93.6 | 94.4 | 86.7 | 93 | 96.4 | 36.7 | 93.2 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 97.8 | 90.9 | 76.9 | 31.5 | 47.4 | 0 | 87.9 | 51.6 |
| PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr Compare | 50 | 20.6 | 17.4 | 29.2 | 67.8 | 0 | 87.3 | 45 |
| be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare | 44.9 | 62.8 | 61.2 | 26.6 | 46.3 | 90.3 | 76.2 | 50.9 |
| DAKboard CPU v4 Compare | 8.4 | 20.6 | 17.4 | 8.5 | 9.9 | 58.7 | 55.2 | 16.9 |
价格
Value & Pricing
This is where the E5-2620 v3 gets interesting. US listings range from USD 49 to USD 170, which is a massive spread for the same silicon. At the low end, you're getting 12 threads and ECC support for less than the cost of a decent keyboard. At the high end, you're overpaying for nostalgia. The EUR market is tighter, EUR 73 to EUR 98, and the GBP listing at 110 is not a deal worth chasing. If you're in the US, hunt for the sub-USD 60 listings and you've got a genuinely compelling budget server chip. The affordability percentile ranking near the top of our database backs this up.
Amazon 1 个报价 最低 €77
Price History
了解更多
Overview
The E5-2620 v3 is a Haswell-EP era Xeon that still has a pulse in 2025, mostly because it's dirt cheap on the used market. You're looking at 6 cores, 12 threads, a 2.4GHz base clock, and a 3.2GHz boost. The PassMark numbers tell the real story: 7743 multi-thread and 1689 single-thread. That single-thread score lands in the bottom half of our database, which means everyday desktop snappiness isn't this chip's strong suit.
But here's the thing. This is a server part, and for server workloads it's not embarrassing. The multi-thread score sits right around average, and the 15MB of L3 cache plus support for up to 768GB of ECC DDR4 means it can chew through memory-hungry tasks without falling over. The 85W TDP is also pretty reasonable for a six-core Xeon from 2014. If you're building a cheap home lab or a NAS that needs ECC memory, this chip starts to make a lot of sense.
Common Questions
Q: Is the E5-2620 v3 good for gaming?
No. Our gaming score for this chip is 23.7 out of 100, which is one of the weakest results in our database. The 2.4GHz base clock and low single-thread PassMark score of 1689 mean modern games will struggle, especially anything that depends on per-core performance.
Q: Can this chip run ECC memory?
Yes. The E5-2620 v3 supports DDR4 ECC memory and can address up to 768GB. That's a huge amount of RAM capacity, which makes it a great fit for ZFS-based NAS builds, virtualization hosts, and other memory-hungry server workloads.
Q: What motherboard do I need for this processor?
You'll need an LGA2011-3 socket motherboard, typically with a C612 chipset for server features. These boards are getting older and harder to find new, but used options are plentiful. Make sure the board's BIOS supports Haswell-EP Xeons before you buy.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this chip if you want a responsive desktop experience or any kind of gaming. The single-thread PassMark score of 1689 is well below average, and the 2.4GHz base clock will make even basic tasks feel sluggish compared to any modern processor. Also skip it if you don't want to deal with aging LGA2011-3 motherboards, which are becoming harder to source and often lack modern features like NVMe boot support out of the box. If you need strong per-core performance, look at a used Ryzen or a newer Xeon E3 instead.
Verdict
The E5-2620 v3 is a one-trick pony, but it's a pretty good trick. If you need cheap ECC memory support, lots of RAM capacity, and enough threads for a home server or NAS, this chip delivers at a price that's hard to argue with. The 7743 multi-thread PassMark score means it won't choke on Plex transcodes, file serving, or light virtualization. Just don't expect it to feel snappy in a desktop environment, and forget about gaming entirely. At USD 49, it's a steal. At USD 170, keep walking.
Usage Scores
- 总体47.8
- AI/LLM45.8
- Budget45.2
- 游戏24
- Server55.6
- Efficiency32.2
- Productivity55